.

Plans for Billerica Road Fire Station Presented

Selectmen also agreed to put a non-binding question on the ballot asking voters how they feel about funding the station within the property tax levy.

The Permanent Building Committee last night presented preliminary plans to the Board of Selectmen for a to be built adjacent to the Town Offices in what is now the upper parking lot.

The project comes as town officials say the current  is beyond repair. A debt exclusion proposal for a new fire station on  was .

Pat Maloney, chairman of the Permanent Building Committee, addressed concerns from residents regarding whether or not the current station could be repaired.

Maloney said the current 60-year-old fire station's lot is far too small and poses safety concerns, in addition to challenges that would be faced complying with building codes, Americans with Disabilities Act codes, energy and seismic codes when it comes to repairing the building."

"If you were to consider tearing the building down and putting another one up, the lot size at 10,000 square feet is still too small," he said. Because the current bays are too small for the trucks, they must all be outside for the firefighters to perform work on them, Maloney said. However when the trucks are outside the lack of space between the trucks and the street is a safety concern, he said.

"The bumper of (one of the trucks) infringes in the street, and to walk around it, it’s a safety situation, so to reconstruct something there ... it's a problem with the lot size and depth of the lot," he said.

The committee had initially considered the rear of the  for a fire station, but Maloney said too many access issues would have to be solved to keep cars from driving on a fire station access road that would have to be established.

The proposed new station would be constructed in the current upper parking lot, keeping some parking in the front of the town offices but adding significant parking in the rear of the building.

"Trucks would enter onto Billerica road, (the fire chief) feels response times would be enhanced as opposed to if the station were located on the back side of the building," said Maloney.  

The proposal would also renovate some town office space and put the fire station's administrative offices and fire prevention in town office space that is currently not being used. Additional meeting space and training space could be constructed within the town offices. 

The proposal includes five bays, kitchen space and a day room for the firefighters.

Maloney said the benefits of this project include renovation of existing and unused town office space, shared meeting space, no acquisition costs, additional parking would be provided and construction would improve the rear property.  

Maloney said the target cost would be about $7.5 million, but those costs have not been validated and the committee will need to do more research.

"Recycling would probably end up at the DPW facility, where it should be," said Maloney. Town Manager Paul Cohen said the food pantry would be relocated though it may still involve the rear parking lot area behind the town offices.

 "We’d absolutely do screening to mitigate sound and light issues for the neighbors…(there was) concern about sounding of alarms within the station. If a door is open during the day, you might hear it, but under normal circumstances you won't hear it. There would be no outside alarms here and sirens and lights wouldn't be used until the trucks cross through an intersection or if there is traffic," said Maloney.

Maloney called the proposal one of the town's better ones of the past few years. He also said he would be happy to meet with residents or put together information sessions for residents who have questions.

"We don’t know where to go from here if this doesn’t (happen)," he said. "Unless you tried to rehabilitate…you’d pay a hefty sum for a building that won't stand the 50 to 100 year test. Should this not go forward I don’t know what to bring up next, short of acquiring land the town doesn’t own…barring this one or any other plan, I don’t know what else we could do."

Selectman Jim Lane suggested if the proposal goes forward, some type of traffic study should be done in the area. Lane said with its close proximity to Center School, there could be conflicts with school busses going in and out of the area, which could be a problem the event of an emergency. 

Cohen said paying for the fire station could be done within the 2.5% tax levy, with the town's current excluded debt decreasing on projects such as the sewer project, school building projects and Department of Public Works facility. 

"As we are paying off excluded debt, we would replace the existing debt declining with new debt, and it would have a level affect on the tax rate," said Cohen. 

Projects funded in a similar way include Adams Library renovations and the Police Station, Cohen said.

"A few years ago we lost state aid and (with the state) addressing the major cost of health insurance, (that cost is) going down, so that’s what’s different," Cohen said. " ...  This being critical need, it was my decision to make this within our operating budget because at end of the day we need to address the fire station space. We don’t have unlimited time. Even if you patch it, you don’t have an adequate station."

Slides with more information on the finances can be viewed as photos above.

Selectmen agreed to put a non-binding question on the ballot for the April 3 election, which will read: "Shall the town pay debt service for a new center fire station adjacent to the town offices from the existing property tax levy? (This fire station would not be financed by a prop 2.5% debt exclusion.)"

Selectmen agreed the question is a good way to get voter feedback on the issue.

"I think this is a great idea, it’s a good transparent approach to poll taxpayers and voters about how they feel about paying out of the existing tax levy," said Lane. "I want make sure this does not mean that we are agreeing to the proposal and we’re attached. It's an attempt to see how the public responds to the question."

The decision to place a question on the ballot was unanimous.

"I hope the people take the time to understand, even though it’s a non binding referendum, we’ll listen to that," said Selectmen Chairman George Dixon.

The full presentation of the proposed fire station can be viewed on the town's website.

Elizabeth Twombly February 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM
Pat Maloney, great presentation. A very informative meeting. Thank you for your and your committee's time and dedication to such a detailed study. As Chairman Dixon pointed out, I also hope folks take the time to review and understand the work that has been done.
Tom Christiano February 28, 2012 at 12:46 PM
This is an excellent summary of last night's presentation and subsequent discussion Krista. I will post it on the Facebook Chelmsford Reps & Residents page now, so that it gets as wide a reading as possible as it is very important that everyone in town be as fully informed on this proposal as possible. Thank you
Paul February 29, 2012 at 12:14 AM
Does anyone understand why we let the buildings in Chelmsford get the point where they need major overhauls or have to be rebuilt?
John DiRocco February 29, 2012 at 12:58 AM
Its all about the "money", patch, duct tape , procrastinate
Rob Mallardo February 29, 2012 at 01:27 AM
5 bays, are we buying more fire trucks or closing other stations to fill this one?
David DiSalvo March 01, 2012 at 10:19 PM
Why are there now 5 bays in this proposal when the last proposal for the one at Wilson Street had 4? Also, is demolition cost for the North Road station included? It was in the last proposal. If not, why not?
Diana LeBlanc March 06, 2012 at 07:52 PM
I haven't seen any discussion of what will happen to the old fire station or its land. Has that been discussed?
Phil stanway March 06, 2012 at 08:42 PM
One idea was to move the Dutton house here,
Tony March 13, 2012 at 08:49 PM
If there's also a renovation of unused town office space for fire admin. and fire prevention why then the need for a two story admin. building? During the Dahlberg/Lane debate we were told that the $9.1M proposal was the best possible option but, as can be seen, a lower cost proposal is possible. Or is it still possible that there's another option out there that's even more acceptable to the residents of this town. I haven't encountered anyone who wouldn't say that a new station is not needed, but it seems that credibility is lacking when these proposals are brought forward. For example, we hear "here's the best option," funding gets shot down, and then we're presented the better "best" option. So residents then ask "how do we know that the best option is on the table?"
Tyler Jozefowicz March 13, 2012 at 11:56 PM
Leave the Dutton House where it is and the Old Center Fire Station where it is . Rehab or sell both, as time and money permit. This moving Dutton to the Fire House and demolition business is the most ludicrous proposal I ever heard in my entire life. As to the " best option" fire station , rephrase that to the next best option. I still think the town was out of its mind, not approving the Wilson Street proposal, and those voting "no" were just taxpayer conscious, nothing to do with the proposal per se, given that most of the residents are fixed income retirees, not upwardly mobile young family centric.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something