patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Should Sperm Donors Be Held Financially Responsible?

Three years after a Kansas man donated his sperm, the state wants him to pay child support.

 

 

A mechanic who answered a Craigslist ad to donate his sperm to a lesbian couple, is now being pursued by the State of Kansas for child support, reports the Kansas City Star.

In 2009, Angela Bauer and Jennifer Schreiner entered into an agreement with the donor, William Marotta to provide his sperm.  They signed a contract that outlined he would be free from any financial responsibility as well as parental privileges, according to the newspaper.  The legal contract stated Marotta was not responsible “for any child support payments demanded of him by any other person or entity, public or private, including any district attorney’s office or other state or county agency, regardless of the circumstances or said demand.”

Although the women offered $50 per donation, Marotta and his wife met with the women and agreed to the contract without accepting the money, reports ABC news.

Now three years later, the mother fell into financial hardship and was told by the Kansas Department of Children and Families that the name of the father was required in order to obtain assistance, ABC reports.

The State of Kansas argues their contract is not valid because the artificial insemination was not performed by a licensed physician; Marotta is therefore responsible for child support.

Marotta's lawyer argues that if the law only protects donors inseminated by a licensed physican, any woman could have a donation shipped and inseminate herself in order to pursue the donor for money.

What do you think?  Should any sperm donor be held responsible for child support?

.....

Related Topics: Talker

Iron Mike

12:02 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

I think it's quite telling – how SOME gay people want their 'rights' on both sides of the law.

They demand their RIGHT to 'equal marriage'...

They DEMAND the 'right to become parents'...in some cases DEMANDING that their employers' insurance PAY for it...

They demand the right to 'equal divorce'....

Then, they DEMAND a sperm donor – they PAID FOR – bear the cost of raising their children...? Anybody see any hypocrisy here...?

Maybe,...if lesbian couples were required to obtain their donor sperm from gay men...?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cee Virtue

7:09 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Iron Mike, it's the State of Kansas demanding the sperm donor pay child support, not the two moms.

Comment_arrow

Roger Lincoln

12:50 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013

As CV said, it's the State of Kansas that is demanding the donor be held responsible. The lesbian couple have both stated that they do not want the donor to be held responsible. We accept your apology Mike.

Tom Maggiacomo

10:01 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

You got to be kidding??!! A guy helps out and he is responsible.

Reply

Leave a comment