patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

LETTER: This Labor Day, Remember The Workers

The following is a letter to the editor.

 

Dear Editor,

For some, Labor Day is simply a date on the calendar marking the unofficial end of summer; a point where the seasons change, children are back in school, and the days start getting shorter.  

For me, Labor Day is a time to commemorate the sacrifices and contributions of America’s workers.  Our country’s history has been shaped by the men and women who work for a living.  We are what makes America great, and Monday is our day.

This could not be more true after the roller coaster year we have had.  In New Hampshire we successfully fought back against "Right to Work for Less" and the attacks on our collective bargaining rights.  The Legislature tried to silence our voice and in turn made us stronger in our solidarity..

On Labor Day, we celebrate the great strides we have made over the last century. Today, every American has the right to a quality education, the right to organize or a join a union, and the chance to retire with security for a healthy future.  For generations, these basic rights brought millions of families out of poverty into the middle class.  These rights helped to fight back against segregation and nepotism – because it does not matter who does the work; all workers are entitled to the same wages.

The labor movement has accomplished many great things throughout the years: Weekends, 40-hour work weeks, sick time, vacation time, safety regulations, and retirements.  Yet, after all the work we have done, some people label us as 'thugs.'  They push messaging to demonize workers who are struggling to make ends meet.  Across the country, people work and live paycheck to paycheck. Some people have to work two and three jobs just to pay their rent.  There is not one state in our great nation where a person can work a 40-hour a week job for minimum wage and still be able to afford an apartment of their own.

This is because workers’ wages have been flat for nearly four decades while “the 1 percent” have reaped all benefits of our increased productivity.

This year marks the 100th anniversary of the Bread and Roses strike – and since that time, the gap between the working class and the “1 percent” has never been wider than it is now. 

September 17marks the one-year anniversary of the Occupy Wall Street movement – and the visions for America’s future have never been more different.

These anniversaries come in the heat of an election campaign that is pitting the ultra-wealthy against everyone else.

This could not be more evident than with Presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who made his money by breaking companies into pieces and shipping jobs overseas. Now he is working to push for lower tax rates for himself and his ultra-wealthy friends.

We need political leaders who will stand up and say “no” to the policies that pushed our economy into recession in the first place.  We need to end the Bush era tax cuts and start requiring everyone to pay their fair share.  This is what we need to do to bring our economy back.  However, the corporations will not let this message get out.  A Supreme Court case two years ago allows corporations to use their vast amounts of money to drown out the voices of the working people.

This was evident in the recall election in Wisconsin, where the Koch Brothers and other Super PACs outspent the Democrats nine-to-one.  “The 1 percent” are dumping millions into secret PACs and “527 organizations” that use anonymous money to buy advertising and attempt to buy elections.

Why should corporate interests have greater “free speech” rights than you and me?  Why should “the 1 percent” have more pull with some of our politicians than “the 99 percent” of voters do? 

Millions of American families are struggling to get by, living day-to-day while “the 1 percent” focuses on tax cuts for the rich.  Corporate interests are pouring money into campaign advertising, trying to drown out the voices of people like me, and you.

Martin Luther King Jr. knew the history of workers’ struggles for economic rights.  “The labor movement was the principal force that transformed misery and despair into hope and progress,” he said in 1965.  “Out of its bold struggles, economic and social reform gave birth to unemployment insurance, old age pensions, government relief for the destitute, and above all new wage levels that meant not mere survival, but a tolerable life. The captains of industry did not lead this transformation; they resisted it until they were overcome.”

This election year, Mitt Romney and the other “captains of industry” are trying to take back all the rights that workers have fought for, and died for, since the Bread and Roses strike.  Are we going to sit back and let them do that?

I’m not.

I will continue to fight for all workers because it is the right thing to do.  I will continue to speak my message to all who will hear. I will not let our country go back a hundred years to when workers were forced to work 80 hours a week for pennies while wealthy mill owners made millions.

This Labor Day, please take the time to remember how far we have come – and how much we stand to lose.

-Matt Murray

Related Topics: Letter to the Editor

Tom Gilroy

4:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Mr. Murray, with all do respect to your labor anthology, the labor movement is dead. This is from someone whose father was in the movement before you were born. They have driven out the textile, steel and heavy manufacturing industries. They have almost driven GM and Chrysler out with their outrageous unfunded pension plans only to be bailed out by the Taxpayers. The public sector unions are doing their best to bankrupt the towns, cities and states with their outrageous demands. Mitt.Romney and Bain Capital has created more jobs than Obama and just for your information MLK was a Republican. Have a wonderful Labor Day and National Empty Chair Day .

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Combs

8:36 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Under Governor Romney Massachusetts ranked 47th in the nation for job growth. And at Bain, while Romney was CEO he was an outsourcing pioneer, shipping jobs overseas from Stream International, Modus Media, and SMTC. AMPAD and GS Industries both closed their doors.

I don't know whether or not the labor movement is dead but I do know that Romney has worked to outsource jobs and reduce wages. It's because of people like him that we need a labor movement and president who supports labor instead of outsourcing it.

ron johnson

10:23 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Mike,
Please provide what jobs Obama has created other than those funded by our taxes. As far as Bain, you may want to do more research. I am not saying that as a company they are a shinning star, but are they are no worse than many other companies. As far as outsourcing jobs, I hate this as well, but to be competitive in world markets, the cost of goods has to be competitve as well. In the 50's and the 60's companies started moving jobs south to non-union states, then they moved to Mexico and other countries. Outsourcing is not new, companies will always look for ways to cut costs and stay in business. This has been true no matter what party is in control of the government.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Combs

10:47 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

I wish Scott Brown and the GOP would stand against tax incentives for outsourcing. Companies will always look for ways to lower wages, cut corners on worker safety, and cut corners in food and product safety. But we don't have to stand for that. We can elect candidates who want to support businesses when they create good paying jobs here at home and not give our tax dollars to help companies outsource jobs.

Ron, are you saying that Romney won't use the power of the Presidency to create jobs, and that jobs created using that power don't count? I disagree. Obama has turned around the job situation. We have a long way to go, but this isn't the time to turn the ship around again. We need to give our President time to finish the job.

This chart shows public (government) and private sector job creation under the last Republican President and under Obama.
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/BUSHvOBAMA_jobsREV.png

ron johnson

11:14 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Mike,

He had his chance, unemployment stands at record levels. My point is that one party is not the reason for outsourcing jobs, we are, we want our goods at the prices we want to pay. If the prices reflected the union wages that companies ran away from, we would not pay for the goods and neither would anyone else. You may not like it, but next time think about it when you buy clothes, tvs and other goods. All I know is that I paid over 400 dollars for a TV made in this country in 1979 and it was a 19in. I just paid 159 dollars for a 39in HD tv. I bet you have done this as well. The trend did not start in the last 4-8 years, it started 40 years ago. You want to blame someone for outsourcing jobs, look at unions and the party them support, the democrats.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Combs

12:38 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Non-union wages aren't good enough for corporations. They want the wages they pay in China. They will always want a race to the bottom for their employees.

I want a President and a party that are going to fight for jobs here. I disagree with the Republican approach of throwing up their hands in helplessness,or worse yet, providing tax incentives to reward companies for outsourcing. We can do better than that.

ron johnson

3:50 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

MIke,
I guess you can not see the point. Higher costs mean higher prices and less exports and no jobs. As far as tax incentives, Congress has not come up with a plan either. The answer is never simple and Obama has had 3 and 1/2 half years to do something, he has not. Jobs cannot be created unless someone is willing to cuts costs and make the things these people produce competitve in the market. The answer is not more taxes or hand-outs. And by the way what tax incentive is there to out-source jobs, the better approach is why not make it easier to do business here, with lower taxes, and less entitlements. As long as the government makes it hard to do business here, companies will not and lower wages are only part of the reason jobs leave the company

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Combs

5:06 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

I don't accept that there is nothing we can do to create jobs in the US except lower taxes and reduce employee wages to less than the Chinese. I simply disagree with Romney and Brown's vision for America. In Romney's vision, the profits aren't even retained or reinvested in America; instead they're stashed in the Cayman Islands.

Low wages leave families unable to afford luxuries or even the basics, and then demand falls off a cliff. Look at the economy we have now and you'll see what I mean. Good wages for employees creates a middle class that can spend money and stimulate business.

ron johnson

4:20 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

MIke,
By the way, Obama was able to get Obamacare through Congress, he was able to get the bulk the the stimulus package through and he was able to get most of what he wanted through. How come you argue that somehow Congress blocked this part of the plan. The fact is that the stimulus package was a big dud, the jobs the auto bail-out saved were union job, not non-union and he passed a huge tax increase as part of health care reform. Companies will chose not to hire people as employees, but will instead hire them as contractors to avoid health care costs, these people will be forced to buy their own or pay fines. Please explain to me how this reforms health care, it merely shifts the costs.

Reply

Leave a comment