patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Deval Patrick Files $13.7B Transportation Bond Bill

The transportation bond bill would provide funding for modernization and maintenance of the transportation system.

 

Gov. Deval Patrick filed a transportation bond bill Wednesday that will finance an ambitious 10-year plan to overhaul the state’s ailing transportation system.

The bill would invest $13.7 billion over 10 years in The 21st Century Transportation Plan “The Way Forward” if it is accepted by the state’s legislature, according to a press release from the governor’s office.

The funding would address a backlog of deferred maintenance and strategically improve the state’s transportation system by reducing congestion on roads, curbing delays and minimizing crowding on trains and buses, according to the press release.

“These investments will create the jobs and opportunity today that will build a stronger Commonwealth for tomorrow,” Patrick said in the statement.

The transportation bond bill, to be funded by existing revenues and additional revenues through passage of tax reform, includes the following investments to complete the 21st Century Transportation Plan and fund the existing transportation capital plan for the next four years.  

  • $3.4 billion to provide $300 million annually in Chapter 90 funds, a 50 percent increase, distributed to Towns and Cities for local road and bridge projects
  • $2.4 billion for transportation construction projects over the next four years that are eligible for 82 percent federal reimbursement of costs, leaving a net state borrowing cost of $432 million
  • $4.6 billion to fully state-fund highway maintenance and construction, including major projects identified in the 21st Century Transportation Plan, such as the I-93/I-95 interchange and Springfield I-91 viaduct
  • $4.4 billion for regional rail projects identified in the Transportation Plan including Green Line expansion, South Coast Rail and South Station expansion
  • $3.3 billion to modernize MBTA subway and bus systems to improve service, safety and customer convenience
  • $604 million for regional transit to modernize bus fleets and infrastructure in regional systems statewide
  • $146 million for information technology projects, including the statutory requirement to implement an asset management system.

.......

Related Topics: Deval Patrick

Dianne Feinstein

12:17 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

What a clown throwing our money around!

Reply

Tyler Jozefowicz

1:22 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Infrastructure and transportation , coupled with higher education expenditures are what make Massachusetts great and the envy of the world.

Great job , Governor Deval Patrick. Keep up the good work.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dianne Feinstein

3:36 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Yes, lets just spend money we don't have and tax people who are struggling with un employment and just trying to put gas in their cars, great idea Tyler. real nice...........Oh boy.

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

5:12 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Diane: we need the infrastructure projects for commerce and business . creates jobs. . Good idea to reduce a regressive sales tax- helps business and consumers and up the income tax a little on the top brackets. If you are struggling , Diane , get a part-time waitress job or lighten up on the material purchases . Hope you're not one of those,-" just came back from Florida vacation or Mertle Beach, and don't want to contribute the the general welfare of the Commonwealth" people. We have a State to run . It didn't stop when you retired.

Comment_arrow

Rob C.

5:26 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Envy of the world? You have got to be joking! We are the joke of the country. Boston is the only major city that shuts down public transit before the bars close.
Has the earliest last call. The state has the worst roads in the region. Taxes on the way up to be close to the highest in the nation again.
Yes I can see how we would be the envy of the world.

Comment_arrow

Mr. G

5:33 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

He meant envy of the third world.

Comment_arrow

Mr. G

5:35 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

And now "expenditures" makes Mass. great - not results.

Comment_arrow

John Gault

6:18 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Got to agree with Tyler on this one. If someone is struggling finacialy and higher taxes are a burden, get another job to pay those taxes. Case closed.

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

10:17 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Rob C. " shut down public transportation before the bars close..." . That's a big one! Envy of the world addresses education. You make my argument. Time for infrastructure repairs unless you think they are free. Don't give me a overused " waste' argument as a fallback to everything . As to unemployment , talk to the CEOs that are shipping the jobs overseas.

Rob C.

5:29 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Get rid of the ~8.5 billion for the mass transit stuff. Those are supposed to be self-sufficient.
If they need more money for MBTA then charge more for its use.
Privatize it completely and watch it turn into a profitable enterprise with better service after it gets out from under the unsustainable out of control union contracts that are dragging it down.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

11:50 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Rob C: If MBTA was privatized the fare would be $10 one way instead of $2.50. Agree the pensions are out of control. Privatize the roads and you will have a toll every 100 yards. How did privatizing Social Security work or vouchers for Medicare ?

Mr. G

7:55 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

The article notes that partial funding will be through tax "reform". It's comical that the governor still thinks that by soaking the "rich" will raise more revenue. It has been proven time and again that progressive tax rates decrease revenues, not increase them. I look forward to the next round of hand-wringing when they cannot understand why they failed to meet their revenue projections

Reply

ron johnson

9:50 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Tyler,
I am not sure how just making an announcement about spending money without any concept of how is will be raised or more to the point some real detail is great. If the roads need so much work then want has the governor being doing since he came into office and why has the democratic controled state house let things get so bad. I know let's blame someone else. Talking does not make someone great, doing does.

Tyler for once try not to climb up of the soapbox and just say the Dem is great no matter what.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

12:03 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

ron johnson: Rob C., made the comments about bad roads, not me. I commented on rail transportation , bridge and other improvements . The state has improved the Chelmsford roads and bridges a great deal. Nice smooth ride down at the center now, right. Side walks , bridge leading into Vinal Sq, Groton Road, side walks along Boston Rd, up to South Row, Littleton Rd going toward Westford, Road crossing rail tracks across Brickhouse pizza , N. Chelm.,etc.
Costs cash. Not free. Doesn't make any sense, does it , unless you're agenda is to bash government all the time. Try not to bash the DEMs all the time. Impossible feat? Maybe a move to northern NH would be better for you. So NH is all Blue now.
Don't complain the roads are bad and then refuse to pay any taxes to repair them.

Rob C.

11:18 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Late night public transit at least on Thursday Friday and Saturday night is a big one Tyler, it will cut down on allot of drunk driving if people can take a train or bus home after the bars close instead of driving. Take a survey and you will see that this is a big complaint in the state (eastern part anyway).

Perhaps you could answer this simple question Tyler.
If there is no waste in MA government spending, why does it cost MA twice as much as NH per mile for road construction? (NH more in line with natl per mile cost) How can they do the same thing that MA is doing and get a better product in the end, at half the cost? I use NH as an example because no matter what road you take heading north into the state, you know the second you cross over the border because the roads are nice and smooth up there.
MA is on a schedule to repave the entire length of 93 from NH to Boston every three years. I think it has been ten years since NH repaved 93 from MA to Manchester and it is still smooth.

As for schools, we do have good public schools in MA but all this extra money he wants to spend in this article is not about education.

Why bring up jobs going out of the country? What does that have to do with this article either. And you can thank Clinton for the start of that.

Stay on topic Tyler and stop just regurgitating the DNC talking points.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

12:16 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

RobC.: Nice idea. let's extend MBTA hours for the drunks. Ever been on a Red Line train @ 1:00Am with a bunch of belligerent drunk people, or drunks after a Bruins game? hire a few more cops for free, too?
The cost of living and the salaries are higher in MA . Want it cheap, move to the Sudan.
I brought up overseas jobs because you or someone else brought up " unemployment" and not being able to pay the taxes; that's why.
MA vs NH costs? Compare NH vs. New Delhi road costs.
DNC talking points? Nothing to do with the DNC. Does the DNC talk about MA road repairs? Road repairs are what you brought out of the hat. Not mentioned in the article . The article spoke to road, rail improvements , not repairs. Stay on topic. Lay off the government bashing for awhile. Doable?

Mr. G

12:06 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Democrats could harvest a great deal of revenue by making peace with a profitable and growing economy and with those productive individuals who create such an economy. But they will, as they always do, embrace new taxes on both upper- and middle-income earners that will restrain economic growth and deprive the revenue that Democrats demand to fund the government they love.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

1:12 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Mr G: we tried trickle down economics for 10 years . Nothing trickled down. It doesn't work. 2001 &2003 Bush income tax cuts mostly to the rich, still in effect for the last 12 years ; 2007 big recession for 5 years . had to throw in the Democrats bit? i just got chastised for raising "DEM talking points" which I did not.
Anyway, the topic is infrastructure , rail transportation and improvements.

ron johnson

1:50 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Tyler,
"4.6 billion to fully state-fund highway maintenance and construction, including major projects identified in the 21st Century Transportation Plan, such as the I-93/I-95 interchange and Springfield I-91 viaduct"

Really, road maintance is not repairs. What is that if not repairs?
I am always amazed when someone challanges your endless cheerleading you start with the nothing is free and if you do not like it move.
To question waste is not to question the government or the value of paying for legitimate expenses. I suppose when you go out to eat or buy something at the store you just pay the price they ask without wondering if it is worth it or if you can get a better deal somewhere else. The food is not free and the goods cost money, but I have the right to question is it worth it when I purchase it. Somehow this concept escapes you. I know roads and bridges cost money to maintain. The question is why have the fallen into disrepair, if the state is so well run. As a taxpayer, I always have the right to question where my tax dollars go and is there waste. If you have no problem with waste and paying for things that may not be worth it, then you can chose to not care. I still do. The bottom line is as always, will support whatever the governor says without even thinking about it. I chose to actually question it first.

Reply

Rob C.

2:40 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Tyler,
If it is not waste or corruption, what is the answer to the question. I will keep numbers even to make it simple.
If NH can pave a road for 1,000,000 per mile and it lasts for 9 years then why does it cost MA 2,000,000 per mile and it only lasts for 3 years?
So to translate, to get the same work done and have it last the same amount of time it costs MA 6,000,000 per mile.
Exactly how is this efficient, productive work? If you had work done at your house would you rather pay a smaller amount or twice and much and have it done three times as often?
And when you answer keep it within the same two states, I am comparing apples to apples, not apples to grapes. Whatever roads New Delhi has are probably better than most in MA and they were done at 1/1000 the cost.
I never advocated privatizing the roads so don’t say things I never did.

As for the MBTA, privatize it, state is responsible for overseeing existing pensions not the private company, fire everybody and cancel all union contracts, rehire everybody at same pay rate as before, they pay into health insurance at same rate as a standard private company would, no pensions, they can invest in an IRA instead. Subsidize at all current rates and charge passengers accordingly until it turns a profit, use profits for capital improvements.
Why should somebody in Springfield have to pay for somebodies commute into Boston?

Reply

SomervilleGirl

9:09 am on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Tyler,

What is your opinion on how we can change the MBTA?

Reply

Leave a comment